TOON vs JSON vs YAML: Which Data Format Should You Use?
The Complete Comparison Guide for LLM Optimization and Data Serialization
When building applications that interact with Large Language Models (LLMs), choosing the right data format can make or break your efficiency. Should you stick with JSON, the familiar standard? Switch to YAML for readability? Or adopt TOON, the emerging format designed specifically for AI?
This comprehensive guide compares TOON, JSON, and YAML across critical dimensions—token efficiency, readability, performance, compatibility, and real-world use cases. By the end, you'll know exactly which format to use for every scenario, including how to convert JSON to TOON and optimize your LLM API costs.
What Are TOON, JSON, and YAML?
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
JSON uses curly braces and commas to structure data. It's been the universal standard for APIs, web services, and general data interchange since 2002.
{
"users": [
{ "id": 1, "name": "Alice", "role": "admin" },
{ "id": 2, "name": "Bob", "role": "user" }
]
}
Tokens Used: ~89 tokens for the above example
YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language)
YAML prioritizes human readability by using indentation instead of braces. It's popular for configuration files (Kubernetes, Docker, CI/CD pipelines).
users:
- id: 1
name: Alice
role: admin
- id: 2
name: Bob
role: user
Tokens Used: ~110 tokens (more than JSON due to verbose key repetition)
TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation)
TOON combines YAML's indentation with CSV's tabular structure and optimizes both for LLM token efficiency. It's purpose-built for AI systems.
users[2]{id,name,role}:
1,Alice,admin
2,Bob,user
Tokens Used: ~45 tokens (50% fewer than JSON, 60% fewer than YAML)
Side-by-Side Comparison: TOON vs JSON vs YAML
| Aspect | TOON | JSON | YAML |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syntax Style | Indentation + tabular | Braces/brackets | Indentation only |
| Human Readability | Excellent (spreadsheet-like) | Good (familiar) | Excellent (clean) |
| Machine Parsing | Optimized for LLMs | Standard parsers | Complex rules |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
| Symbol Count | Minimal (no braces/quotes) | High (repetitive) | Low (but verbose keys) |
Winner: TOON for LLM use cases, YAML for human configuration, JSON for familiarity.
Token Efficiency: Real Benchmarks
Dataset: 100 GitHub repositories with 11 fields each
| Format | Tokens | vs JSON | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOON | 8,745 | — (Baseline) | 70.1% |
| JSON (formatted) | 15,145 | +73% | 65.4% |
| JSON (compact) | 11,234 | +22% | 67.2% |
| YAML | 16,892 | +93% | 62.8% |
| XML | 24,567 | +181% | 58.3% |
How TOON Reduces Tokens
Savings Mechanism: TOON declares object keys once in a header instead of repeating them for every row. On large uniform datasets, this compounds dramatically.
- Repeats
"id":,"name":,"role":exactly 100 times each - Total redundancy: 300+ key repetitions
- Declares keys once in header:
{id,name,role}: - Rows contain only values
- Result: 50-60% token reduction
Token Savings by Dataset Type
| Dataset Type | TOON Savings | Best Format | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform tabular (100+ rows) | 50-60% | TOON | CSV-like structure excels |
| Analytics time-series (180+ days) | 58.9% | TOON | Extreme repetition = max savings |
| E-commerce orders | 35-40% | TOON | Even with nested items |
| GitHub repositories | 42.3% | TOON | Moderate uniformity |
| Deeply nested config | 10-20% | JSON | TOON adds overhead |
| Small datasets (<10 items) | 0-15% | JSON | Overhead negates savings |
| Non-uniform mixed arrays | 0-10% | JSON | Incompatible structures |
When to Use TOON vs JSON vs YAML
✅ Use TOON When:
- Working with LLMs - Token efficiency matters
- Large uniform datasets - 50+ rows with same field structure
- API cost optimization - Sending thousands of records to Claude/GPT-4
- Analytics/time-series data - Repetitive records compound savings
- RAG systems - Feeding document chunks to embedding models
- Building AI agents - Data formatting is on the critical path
Ideal Use Cases: Customer database with 10,000+ identical records, daily metrics for 180+ days, e-commerce product feeds, user behavior logs, transaction histories
✅ Use JSON When:
- Building REST APIs - Universal client support essential
- Web applications - Native browser support
- Small datasets - (<10 items, overhead negligible)
- Deeply nested data - Configuration objects, hierarchical structures
- Non-uniform records - Fields vary between objects
- Collaboration required - Team familiarity is critical
- Tool ecosystem matters - Linters, validators, debuggers
Ideal Use Cases: REST API responses, configuration management, mixed/hierarchical data structures, general-purpose data interchange
✅ Use YAML When:
- Configuration files - Kubernetes, Docker, CI/CD pipelines
- Infrastructure-as-Code - IaC tools (Terraform, Ansible, Helm)
- Human editing required - Comments and readability crucial
- Documentation coupled with data - README files, example configs
- DevOps automation - Standards across industry
Ideal Use Cases: Kubernetes manifests, Docker Compose files, GitHub Actions workflows, Terraform variable files, CI/CD pipeline definitions
Real-World Scenarios: Cost Savings Analysis
Scenario 1: ChatGPT API with 100 User Records
Problem: Sending 100 customer records to GPT-4 via API calls.
JSON Approach:
- Tokens Used: 3,245 tokens
- API Cost: 3,245 × $0.03/1K = $0.09 per call
TOON Approach:
- Tokens Used: 1,189 tokens
- API Cost: 1,189 × $0.03/1K = $0.04 per call
Savings: 2,056 tokens (63%) = $0.05 per call
At 1,000 calls/day: $50/day = $18,250/year saved
Scenario 2: Analytics Dashboard - 180 Days of Daily Metrics
Data: Daily revenue, users, sessions, bounce rate, conversion rate
JSON (180 days):
- Tokens Used: 10,977 tokens
TOON (180 days):
- Tokens Used: 4,507 tokens
Savings: 6,470 tokens (58.9% reduction)
If querying daily: 6,470 × 30 days × $0.03 = $5.82/month saved
Scenario 3: RAG System - Embedding 10,000 Documents
Problem: Your RAG system embeds 10,000 documents with metadata.
JSON Size:
- Each document's metadata = 200 tokens
- Total: 10,000 × 200 = 2,000,000 tokens
TOON Size:
- Each document's metadata = 85 tokens
- Total: 10,000 × 85 = 850,000 tokens
Savings: 1,150,000 tokens (57.5% reduction)
API Cost Savings: 1,150,000 × $0.0006 = $690 per embedding run
How to Convert JSON to TOON
Method 1: Online Converter (Easiest)
Visit our free JSON to TOON converter and paste your JSON:
{
"users": [
{ "id": 1, "name": "Alice", "role": "admin" },
{ "id": 2, "name": "Bob", "role": "user" },
{ "id": 3, "name": "Charlie", "role": "user" }
]
}
Instant Output:
users[3]{id,name,role}:
1,Alice,admin
2,Bob,user
3,Charlie,user
Method 2: JavaScript Implementation
For comprehensive JavaScript examples with Node.js, Express.js, and production patterns, see our complete JavaScript implementation guide.
npm install @toon-format/toon
const toon = require('@toon-format/toon');
const jsonData = {
users: [
{ id: 1, name: "Alice", role: "admin" },
{ id: 2, name: "Bob", role: "user" }
]
};
// Encode to TOON
const toonString = toon.encode(jsonData);
console.log(toonString);
// Decode back to JSON
const decoded = toon.decode(toonString);
console.log(decoded);
Method 3: Python Implementation
pip install toon-format
from toon_format import encode, decode
json_data = {
"users": [
{"id": 1, "name": "Alice", "role": "admin"},
{"id": 2, "name": "Bob", "role": "user"}
]
}
# Encode to TOON
toon_string = encode(json_data)
print(toon_string)
# Decode back to Python dict
decoded = decode(toon_string)
print(decoded)
Performance Comparison: Speed & Parsing
Parsing Speed
| Format | Parse Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| JSON | ~100µs | Fast, simple rules |
| TOON | ~120µs | Slightly slower (array validation) |
| YAML | ~500µs+ | Whitespace rules = complex parsing |
| XML | ~300µs+ | Tag matching overhead |
Verdict: JSON is marginally faster, but TOON's overhead is negligible (20µs) compared to token cost savings.
LLM Comprehension Accuracy
Test: 209 data retrieval questions across 4 LLM models
| Format | Accuracy | Tokens | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOON | 73.9% | 2,744 | 26.9 |
| JSON (pretty) | 71.0% | 3,081 | 23.0 |
| JSON (compact) | 69.7% | 2,957 | 23.6 |
| YAML | 68.2% | 3,447 | 19.8 |
| XML | 64.1% | 4,123 | 15.5 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace all my JSON with TOON?
No. Use TOON specifically for:
- Data sent to LLMs
- Large uniform datasets
- Cost-critical APIs
Keep JSON for:
- REST APIs (client compatibility)
- Deeply nested data
- Mixed/non-uniform structures
- General-purpose interchange
Can LLMs understand TOON format?
Yes! Benchmark testing shows TOON achieves 73.9% accuracy vs JSON's 69.7% on data retrieval tasks. Modern LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini) handle TOON natively once they've seen examples.
What's the token savings on real API calls?
Depends on data structure:
- Uniform tabular: 50-60% savings
- Analytics/time-series: 55-60% savings
- Mixed/nested: 10-20% savings
- Deeply nested config: 0-10% savings (JSON may be better)
On a $1,000/month OpenAI bill, expect $300-600/month savings with TOON.
Which LLM providers support TOON?
All major LLM APIs accept TOON as text input (it's just formatted text to the API):
- OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-5)
- Anthropic (Claude)
- Google (Gemini)
- Cohere
- Mistral
- Local models (Ollama, LLaMA)
How do I convert existing JSON to TOON?
Three options:
- Online converter: Visit toonifyit.com
- JavaScript: Use
@toon-format/toonnpm package - Python: Use
toon-formatpip package
All support round-trip conversion (JSON ↔ TOON).
Conclusion: Making Your Choice
The choice between TOON, JSON, and YAML depends on your specific use case:
| Use Case | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| LLM APIs at scale | TOON | 30-60% token savings = major cost reduction |
| REST APIs | JSON | Universal client support |
| Configuration files | YAML | Readability and comments |
| Small projects | JSON | Simplicity and ecosystem |
| Analytics to LLMs | TOON | 50-60% savings on repetitive data |
| Deeply nested data | JSON | TOON adds overhead |
| DevOps/IaC | YAML | Industry standard |
| RAG systems | TOON | Minimize embedding context token usage |
Key Takeaways
- ✅ TOON reduces LLM token usage by 30-60% through intelligent tabular compression
- ✅ TOON improves LLM accuracy (73.9% vs 69.7%) with explicit structure
- ✅ Use TOON for uniform arrays feeding into LLMs (customers, orders, metrics)
- ✅ Keep JSON for mixed data, APIs, and backward compatibility
- ✅ Choose YAML only for human-edited configuration (DevOps, IaC)
- ✅ Easy conversion from JSON to TOON via online tools or libraries
Next Steps
Ready to start optimizing your LLM costs? Here's what to do:
- Try our free JSON to TOON converter - Test with your real data
- How to Convert JSON to TOON - Step-by-step tutorial
- TOON Format Guide - Deep technical dive
- LLM Token Optimization - Complete cost reduction guide
- TOON Documentation - Complete syntax reference
- More TOON Articles - Tutorials and best practices
Start Saving on LLM Costs Today
Convert your JSON to TOON and reduce token usage by 30-60%.